University of Kansas, Spring 2005
Philosophy 674: Philosophy of Law
Ben Eggleston—eggleston@ku.edu
Class notes: chapter 5
The following notes correspond
roughly to what we cover, including at least a portion of what I put on the
board or the screen, in class. In places they may be more or less comprehensive than what we
actually cover in class, and should not be taken as a substitute for your own
observations and records of what goes on in class.
The following outline is designed to
be, and is in some Web browsers, collapsible: by clicking on the heading for a
section, you can collapse that section or, if it’s already collapsed, make it
expanded again. If you want to print some but not all of this outline, collapse
the parts you don’t want to print (so that just their top-level headings
remain), and then click here to print this frame.
-
pp. 135–147
- the utilitarian approach to punishment
- Punishment is inherently bad, since it’s a harm for the person being
punished.
- But punishment can still be justified, if its other consequences are good
enough.
- The main objection to the utilitarian approach is that it seems to require
punishment even when, intuitively, punishment is not really morally justified
(such as when it requires that an innocent person be punished).
- the retributivist approach to punishment
- Punishment is a matter of desert—criminals deserve to be punished
regardless of whether it promotes safety, deterrence, etc.
- There are many objections to this approach; one prominent one is that it
is hard to see how any conduct naturally deserves criminal punishment.
- the therapeutic approach to punishment
- Punishment is a matter of therapy—criminals should be trained so that they
do not continue to break the law.
- There are many objections to this approach; one prominent one is that it
would seem to sanction preventive punishment—punishing people (or, rather,
“helping” them) before they break the law.
- pp. 147–157—lecture based on study questions
- pp. 157–166—lecture based on study questions