University of Kansas, Fall 2003
Philosophy 160: Introduction to Ethics
Ben Eggleston—eggleston@ku.edu
Meta-ethics test questions
The test will be given in class on Monday, September 22, and will consist
of 100 points’ worth of questions.
- There will be eight questions, worth 5 points each, requiring you to
select quotations that answer certain questions. For example, a question might
be “What thesis is characteristic of simple subjectivism?” or “What is one
claim that is used in an objection to psychological egoism?” and you would
have to select the quotation that best answers the question. (There will be
perhaps three times as many answers as questions, so this part of the test
will not be as simple as one-to-one matching. But the answers will be grouped
into several reasonably-sized answer banks instead of all being in one huge
answer bank.)
- There will be four short-answer questions from the following list—two
10-point questions and two 20-point questions.
- (20 points:) What is meta-ethics? What is an example of something that a
meta-ethicist might say, and what is an example of something about ethics
that someone might say, but that doesn’t have anything to do with
meta-ethics?
- (10 points:) What is the cultural-differences argument? What is one
of Rachels’s objections to this argument?
- (20 points:) If the cultural differences argument is unsound, does that
mean that its conclusion is false? Why or why not?
- (10 points:) What are two implications of cultural relativism that Rachels
mentions as an objection to that view?
- (20 points:) What is simple subjectivism, and what is emotivism? What is
the main difference between them?
- (10 points:) What is meant by the claim that simple subjectivism fails
to account for moral disagreement?
- (20 points:) What are two independent interpretations of the concepts of
the natural and the unnatural that might be used to try to
derive moral principles from statements about what is natural and what is
unnatural? What criticisms can be offered against attempts to derive
morality from nature that are based on these two interpretations of these
concepts?
- (10 points:) What point is Hume making in the passage in which he writes,
“I am surpriz’d to find, that instead of the usual copulations of
propositions, is, and is not, I meet with no proposition that is
not connected with an ought, or an ought not”?
- (20 points:) What is the main point of Stevenson’s paper “The Emotive
Meaning of Ethical Terms”? What would Stevenson say to someone who says, “You
promised to mow my lawn; now you are just being irrational if you fail to see
that it would be wrong for you not to mow my lawn”?
- (10 points:) What are the two standard interpretations of the
divine-command theory?
- (20 points:) What two objections to the first interpretation of the
divine-command theory does Rachels offer?
- (10 points:) What is psychological egoism? What is one statement or belief
that people might associate with psychological egoism, but that is not
actually equivalent to that view?
- (20 points:) Suppose someone were to say that psychological egoism is true
because people don’t do things they don’t want to do, and wanting is an
inherently self-interested state of mind. What can be said against this
argument for psychological egoism?
- (10 points:) What is the relevance, to psychological egoism, of the
notion of a theory’s being verifiable?