University of Kansas, Spring 2003
Philosophy 161: Introduction to Ethics, Honors
Ben Egglestoneggleston@ku.edu

Test Questions—Meta-ethics

The test will be given in class on Wednesday, February 26, and will consist of 100 points’ worth of the following questions: three 20-point questions and four 10-point questions. There may also be a bonus question or two, not listed here.

  1. (20 points:) What is cultural relativism? What is one statement or belief that people might associate with cultural relativism, but that is not actually equivalent to that view?
  2. (10 points:) What is the cultural-differences argument? What is one of Rachels’s objections to this argument?
  3. (10 points:) What is one implication of cultural relativism that Rachels mentions as an objection to that view?
  4. (20 points:) What is simple subjectivism, and what is emotivism? What is the main difference between them?
  5. (10 points:) What are the two objections to simple subjectivism that Rachels mentions?
  6. (10 points:) What standard, if any, does emotivism provide for what counts as a reason in support of a particular moral judgment?
  7. (20 points:) What are two independent interpretations of the concepts of the natural and the unnatural that might be used to try to derive moral principles from statements about what is natural and what is unnatural? What criticisms can be offered against attempts to derive morality from nature that are based on these two interpretations of these concepts? Why, in general, is it so hard to derive moral principles from statements about nature?
  8. (10 points:) What point is Hume making in the passage in which he writes, “I am surpriz’d to find, that instead of the usual copulations of propositions, is, and is not, I meet with no proposition that is not connected with an ought, or an ought not”?
  9. (20 points:) What is the main point of Stevenson’s paper “The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms”? What would Stevenson say to someone who says, “You promised to mow my lawn; now you are just being irrational if you fail to see that it would be wrong for you not to mow my lawn”?
  10. (10 points:) What are the two standard interpretations of the divine-command theory?
  11. (20 points:) What two objections to the first interpretation of the divine-command theory does Rachels offer?
  12. (10 points:) What is psychological egoism? What is one statement or belief that people might associate with psychological egoism, but that is not actually equivalent to that view?
  13. (20 points:) Suppose someone were to say that psychological egoism is true because people don’t do things they don’t want to do, and wanting is an inherently self-interested state of mind. What can be said against this argument for psychological egoism?
  14. (10 points:) What is the relevance, to psychological egoism, of the notion of a theory’s being verifiable?