University of Kansas, Spring 2003
Philosophy 161: Introduction to Ethics, Honors
Ben Eggleston—eggleston@ku.edu
Questions—Final Exam
The final exam will be given on Wednesday, May 14, from 7:30 a.m. to 10 a.m., in the room where we have class, and will consist of 100 points’ worth of
the following questions. This will be an open-book, open-note exam. If you don’t want to take the exam in class, you may
turn in typed answers to any of these questions in advance, and when I grade the
answers that are written in class, I’ll grade the corresponding answers that you
turn in. Answers that you provide to questions that do not end up being on the
exam will not increase your grade, nor will the lack of such answers decrease
your grade. Note that, whether you answer each of the following questions or
not, you must number each of your answers, because when I grade your answers,
I’ll be looking for them one by one, as answers to specific questions, rather
than reading all of what you turn in from beginning to end. Your answers must be
typed and double-spaced, and they must be turned in to me at my office (3070
Wescoe Hall) by 7:15 a.m. on Wednesday, May 14, or turned in at the site of the
final exam within the first half hour of the exam period (by 8 a.m. on
Wednesday, May 14). You can slide your work under the door
to my office if I’m not there when you come by to turn it in.
Whether you take the exam in class or not, if you want me to mail your
exam to you after I grade it, give me an envelope
with your address on it. If you don’t turn in an envelope to me, you can pick up
your graded exam from me any time until the end of May.
- (10 points:) What is cultural relativism? What is one statement or belief
that people might associate with cultural relativism, but that is not actually
equivalent to that view?
- (20 points:) What is the main point of Stevenson’s paper “The Emotive
Meaning of Ethical Terms”? What would Stevenson say to someone who says, “You
promised to mow my lawn; now you are just being irrational if you fail to see
that it would be wrong for you not to mow my lawn”?
- (10 points:) What is the relevance, to psychological egoism, of the
notion of a theory’s being verifiable?
- (20 points:) What is the method by which normative-ethical theories are
usually judged or evaluated? Give an example of how this method might be used
to defend some particular theory, and how it might be used to criticize some
particular theory.
- (10 points:) What is the difference between consequentialism and
welfarism? How could one be a consequentialist without being a welfarist, and
how could one be a welfarist without being a consequentialist?
- (10 points:) On what basis might one claim that, despite Kant’s own
avowals regarding the implications of his theory, the categorical imperative
does not prohibit lying in all cases?
- (10 points:) What is the fundamental difference between virtue ethics and
traditional normative-ethical theories?
- (10 points:) Why does Singer think that the principle of equal
consideration of interests can be defended without basing it on some fact of
equality? And why does Singer want not to base the principle on some
fact of equality?
- (20 points:) What is Singer’s conception of personhood? According to
Singer, what answers do classical utilitarianism and preference utilitarianism
give to the question of whether personhood is a morally significant threshold?
- (10 points:) What is the difference between the “total” view and the
“prior existence” view? What is Singer’s main concern about each of these?
- (10 points:) What, according to Singer, is the connection between (1)
according moral significance to the distinction between killing someone and
letting her die and (2) choosing a rule-based theory of morality over a consequentialist
one?
- (10 points:) What is the “triage” approach to the problem of world
poverty? In what ways does Singer agree and disagree with this approach?
- (10 points:) What is the basic idea of “deep ecology” as an approach to
environmental ethics?
- (10 points:) Why, according to Singer, is civil disobedience justified in
more circumstances than other non-violent illegal activity is?
- (20 points:) What is the connection between subjectivism and a
normative-ethical theory? Can one be a subjectivist and consistently espouse a
normative-ethical theory, or must a proponent of a normative-ethical theory
deny subjectivism?
- (20 points:) What positions does Singer take on three major meta-ethical
issues—cultural relativism, subjectivism, and basing morality on religion?
- (20 points:) Singer’s approach to ethics is, of course, a form of
utilitarianism. Pick one of the other normative-ethical theories we studied
and summarize what Singer says in opposition to it.